@article {nunez19, title = {Escrowed decryption protocols for lawful interception of encrypted data}, journal = {IET Information Security}, volume = {13}, year = {2019}, month = {09/2019}, pages = {498 -- 507}, publisher = {IET}, abstract = {

Escrowed decryption schemes (EDSs) are public-key encryption schemes with an escrowed decryption functionality that allows authorities to decrypt encrypted messages under investigation, following a protocol that involves a set of trusted entities called {\textquoteleft}custodians{\textquoteright}; only if custodians collaborate, the requesting authority is capable of decrypting encrypted data. This type of cryptosystem represents an interesting trade-off to privacy versus surveillance dichotomy. In this study, the authors propose two EDSs where they use proxy re-encryption to build the escrowed decryption capability, so that custodians re-encrypt ciphertexts, in a distributed way, upon request from an escrow authority, and the re-encrypted ciphertexts can be opened only by the escrow authority. Their first scheme, called EDS, follows an all-or-nothing approach, which means that escrow decryption only works when all custodians collaborate. Their second scheme, called threshold EDS, supports a threshold number of custodians for the escrow decryption operation. They propose definitions of semantic security with respect to the authorities, custodians and external entities, and prove the security of their schemes, under standard pairing-based hardness assumptions. Finally, they present a theoretical and experimental analysis of the performance of both schemes, which show that they are applicable to real-world scenarios.

}, issn = {1751-8709}, author = {David Nu{\~n}ez and Isaac Agudo and Javier Lopez} } @article {Agudo2008d, title = {Enabling Attribute Delegation in Ubiquitous Environments}, journal = {Mobile Networks and Applications}, volume = {13}, number = {3-4}, year = {2008}, month = {August}, pages = {398-410}, publisher = {Springer}, abstract = {

When delegation is implemented using the attribute certificates in a Privilege Management Infrastructure (PMI), it is possible to reach a considerable level of distributed functionality. However, the approach is not flexible enough for the requirements of ubiquitous environments. The PMI can become a too complex solution for devices such as smartphones and PDAs, where resources are limited. In this work we present an approach to solve the previous limitations by defining a second class of attributes, called domain attributes, which are managed directly by users and are not right under the scope of the PMI, thus providing a light solution for constrained devices. However, we relate the two classes of attributes are related by defining a simple ontology. While domain attribute credentials are defined using SAML notation, global attributes are defined using X.509 certificates. For this reason, we additionally introduce XSAML so that both kinds of credentials are integrated. We also introduce the concept of Attribute Federation which is responsible for supporting domain attributes and the corresponding ontology.

}, keywords = {attribute based authorization, delegation, federation}, issn = {1383-469X}, doi = {10.1007/s11036-008-0062-4}, author = {Isaac Agudo and Javier Lopez and Jose A. Montenegro} } @inproceedings {Agudo2008b, title = {An Evolutionary Trust and Distrust Model}, booktitle = {4th Workshop on Security and Trust Management (STM{\textquoteright}08)}, series = {ENTCS}, volume = {224}, year = {2008}, pages = {3-12}, publisher = {Elsevier}, organization = {Elsevier}, address = {Trondheim, Norway}, abstract = {

In this paper we propose a trust model, where besides considering trust and distrust, we also consider another parameter that measures the reliability on the stability of trust or distrust. The inclusion of this new parameter will allow us to use trust in a more accurate way. We consider trust is not static but dynamic and trust values can change along time. Thus, we will also take time into account, using it as a parameter of our model. There is very little work done about the inclusion of time as an influence on trust. We will show the applicability of our model in the scenario of the process of reviewing papers for a conference. Sometimes for these kind of processes the Chair of the conference should first find the suitable reviewers. He can make this selection by using our model. Once the reviewers are selected they send out their reviews to the Chair who can also use our model in order to make the final decision about acceptance of papers.

}, issn = {1571-0661}, doi = {10.1016/j.entcs.2009.07.034}, author = {Isaac Agudo and Carmen Fernandez-Gago and Javier Lopez} } @inproceedings {1735, title = {Especificaci{\'o}n formal y verificaci{\'o}n de requisitos de Seguridad}, booktitle = {VIII Reuni{\'o}n Espa{\~n}ola sobre Criptolog{\'\i}a y Seguridad de la Informaci{\'o}n (VIII RECSI)}, year = {2004}, month = {Sep 2004}, pages = {225-235}, address = {Madrid (Spain)}, isbn = {84-7978-650-7}, author = {Isaac Agudo and Javier Lopez and Juan J. Ortega} }