@article {1589, title = {Digital Identity and Identity Management Technologies}, journal = {UPGRADE - The European Journal of the Informatics Professional}, volume = {2010}, year = {2010}, pages = {6 - 12}, publisher = {CEPIS}, abstract = {

There are many technologies for identity management available in the form of open specifications, open source tools and commercial applications. Currently, there are some competing standards for identity management. At the beginning SAML was the only viable choice with a higher enough acceptance level. Recently, another technology called WS-Federation has also gain some attention from the community. Although this technology is not as mature as SAML, it modular design gives it some advantages over SAML. It this work we mainly focus on the WS-Federation and the family of specifications that surround it.

}, issn = {1684-5285}, url = {http://www.cepis.org/upgrade/files/issue-1-2010-agudo.ruiz.pdf}, author = {Isaac Agudo} } @inproceedings {Agudo2010, title = {Distribuci{\'o}n segura de componentes software basada en OpenID}, booktitle = {XI Reuni{\'o}n Espa{\~n}ola sobre Criptolog{\'\i}a y Seguridad de la Informaci{\'o}n (RECSI 2010)}, year = {2010}, month = {September}, address = {Tarragona, Spain}, abstract = {

En la actualidad, cada vez son m\ás frecuentes los ataques software mediante la utilizaci\ón de malware o sustituci\ón de programas (o componentes) en los repositorios a los cuales los usuarios finales (o m\áquinas) acceden. Esta situaci\ón se ve de alguna manera acentuada con el dinamismo existente en la programaci\ón y ejecuci\ón de estos componentes, en la que distintos desarrolladores pueden participar para desplegar un determinado servicio o parte de \él. Por ello, en este art\ículo se presenta una soluci\ón para la distribuci\ón de c\ódigo de forma segura usando OpenID y firmas con certificados de clave p\ública de corta duraci\ón. De esta forma, se consigue un compromiso de seguridad que permite distribuir c\ódigo firmado sin la necesidad de que los desarrolladores dispongan a priori de un certificado espec\ífico. Presentamos adem\ás algunos detalles acerca de la implementaci\ón realizada para hacer realidad este dise\ño.

}, isbn = {978-84-693-3304-4}, author = {Isaac Agudo and Jose A. Onieva and Daniel Merida} } @inproceedings {Agudo2008, title = {Delegating Privileges over Finite Resources: A Quota Based Delegation Approach}, booktitle = {5th International Workshop on Formal Aspects in Security and Trust (FAST{\textquoteright}08)}, series = {LNCS}, volume = {5491}, year = {2008}, pages = {302-315}, publisher = {Springer}, organization = {Springer}, address = {Malaga (Spain)}, abstract = {

When delegation in real world scenarios is considered, the delegator (the entity that posses the privileges) usually passes the privileges on to the delegatee (the entity that receives the privileges) in such a way that the former looses these privileges while the delegation is effective. If we think of a physical key that opens a door, the privilege being delegated by the owner of the key is opening the door. Once the owner of the key delegates this privilege to another entity, by handing over the key, he is not able to open the door any longer. This is due to the fact that the key is not copied and handed over but handed over to the delegatee. When delegation takes place in the electronic world, the delegator usually retains also the privileges. Thus, both users have them simultaneously. This situation, which in most cases is not a problem, may be undesirable when dealing with certain kind of resources. In particular, if we think of finite resources, those in which the number of users accessing simultaneously is finite, we can not allow that a user delegating his access privilege is also granted access when the delegation if effective. In this paper we propose an approach where each user is delegated an access quota for a resource. If further delegating of the delegated quota occurs, this is subtracted from his quota. That is, when delegating, part of the quota remains with the delegator and another part goes to the delegatee. This allows a more fairly access to the resource. Moreover, we show that this approach can also be applied to any kind of resources by defining appropriate authorization policies.

}, isbn = {978-3-642-01464-2}, issn = {0302-9743 (Print) 1611-3349 (Online)}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-01465-9}, author = {Isaac Agudo and Carmen Fernandez-Gago and Javier Lopez} } @article {JavierLopez2007, title = {On the deployment of a real scalable delegation service}, journal = {Information Security Technical Report}, volume = {12}, number = {3}, year = {2007}, month = {Jun 2007}, pages = {139-147}, publisher = {Elsevier}, abstract = {

This paper explains the evolution of the concept of delegation since its first references in the context of distributed authorization to the actual use as a fundamental part of a privilege management architecture. The work reviews some of the earliest contributions that pointed out the relevance of delegation when dealing with distributed authorization, in particular we comment on PolicyMaker and Keynote, and also on SDSI/SPKI. Then, we elaborate on Federation as a particular case of delegation, and remark the importance given to federation by the industry. Finally, the paper discusses about privilege management infrastructures, introducing a new mechanism to extend their functionality using advanced delegation services.

}, issn = {1363-4127}, doi = {10.1016/j.istr.2007.05.008}, author = {Javier Lopez and Isaac Agudo and Jose A. Montenegro} } @inproceedings {IsaacAgudo2005a, title = {Delegation Perspective of Practical Authorization Schemes}, booktitle = {Fifth International Network Conference (INC{\textquoteright}05)}, year = {2005}, pages = {157-164}, address = {Samos Island, Greece}, isbn = {960-7475-32-1}, author = {Isaac Agudo and Javier Lopez and Jose A. Montenegro and Eiji Okamoto and Ed Dawson} }